Comparison of Smart Contracts and Traditional Contracts
Contracts are essential tools in business and everyday life to resolve disputes between parties. Traditional contracts are typically made in writing and become valid with the signatures of the parties. In recent years, with the rise of digitalization, smart contracts have started to play a significant role in contract law. Unlike traditional contracts, smart contracts are self-executing agreements that are carried out automatically based on predetermined conditions in a digital environment. This article compares smart contracts with traditional contracts.
1. Definition and Key Features

Traditional Contracts:
Traditional contracts are written or oral agreements made between parties who mutually agree on the terms. The validity of these contracts is ensured by the mutual declaration of the parties’ wills and their written approval. Usually, courts or other legal authorities are involved in enforcing the terms of the contract.

Smart Contracts:
Smart contracts are digital agreements that run on blockchain technology. They automatically execute when specific conditions are met and operate based on predefined rules to prevent disputes between parties. Smart contracts are typically expressed through software code and work in a decentralized network.

2. Execution and Enforcement

Execution of Traditional Contracts:
Traditional contracts are executed when the parties fulfill their respective obligations. If one party fails to meet the contract terms, the other party can go to court and initiate legal proceedings.

Execution of Smart Contracts:
Smart contracts start operating automatically when a specific condition is met. This eliminates the need for an enforcement mechanism between the parties. For example, in a payment transaction, once payment is received, the smart contract can automatically initiate another action. Thus, the terms of the contract are executed without the risk of dispute.
3. Security and Risk of Errors

Security of Traditional Contracts:
Traditional contracts are physical documents and are vulnerable to security threats such as signature falsification, document loss, or fraud. Additionally, when enforcement is required, legal procedures must be followed to ensure the parties' security.

Security of Smart Contracts:
Smart contracts are built on blockchain technology and are protected by encryption, ensuring the integrity of the contract and preventing fraud. However, there are still risks such as software errors or malicious attacks, so it is essential to program smart contracts correctly.

4. Application Areas and Flexibility

Application Areas of Traditional Contracts:
Traditional contracts have a broad range of applications, including trade, rental agreements, employment contracts, and inheritance matters. However, disputes between parties often require recourse to courts.

Application Areas of Smart Contracts:
Smart contracts are widely used in digital environments, automated transactions, and blockchain-based projects. They have great potential in areas like cryptocurrency transfers, digital asset trading, voting systems, and supply chain management.

Conclusion

Smart contracts offer a more secure, faster, and automated solution compared to traditional contracts. However, both types of contracts have their advantages and limitations. Traditional contracts remain valid and useful in many situations, but with the growth of the digital world, the use of smart contracts will increase and provide an important alternative alongside traditional contracts.
© All rights reserved.
Crypto Law Istanbul - 2025
Made on
Tilda