Example Cases Regarding Liability of Cryptocurrency Platforms
How cryptocurrency platforms fulfill or neglect their legal and ethical responsibilities can be explained with various example cases. These cases highlight the importance of regulatory compliance, security measures, and the protection of user funds. Here are some notable examples:
1. The Mt. Gox Incident (2014)

Summary of the Incident:

Mt. Gox was one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges in the world, established in 2010.

In 2014, a hacking incident occurred where 850,000 Bitcoins were stolen.

The value of the stolen Bitcoins was approximately $450 million at the time, but today, this figure is worth billions.

The incident was caused by insufficient security measures.

Breach of Responsibility:

Lack of Security: Mt. Gox failed to implement adequate security measures to protect user funds.

Lack of Transparency: The platform delayed informing users about the attack and could not provide refunds.

Outcome:

Mt. Gox went bankrupt, and its founder Mark Karpeles was prosecuted for financial fraud and embezzlement.

Users received limited compensation after years of legal proceedings.


2. Binance Hack Incident (2019)

Summary of the Incident:

In 2019, Binance, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, suffered a hacking attack.

Approximately 7,000 Bitcoins (worth $40 million) were stolen.

The attack was executed by compromising user API keys and two-factor authentication (2FA) data.

Responsibility and Response:

Binance used a Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) to fully compensate for the losses.

The platform strengthened its security protocols and transparently informed users after the incident.

Outcome:

Binance maintained trust due to its swift and user-focused approach.

This case highlighted the importance of insurance funds for platforms.


3. FTX Collapse (2022)

Summary of the Incident:

FTX was a rapidly growing cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried.

The company misused user funds for risky investments through its affiliate Alameda Research.

Weak financial structures led to a major liquidity crisis, and the company filed for bankruptcy.

Breach of Responsibility:

Mismanagement: FTX violated ethics by using user funds for personal gains.

Lack of Transparency: The platform failed to inform users about its financial instability.

Outcome:

Users lost billions of dollars, with many losing their life savings.

Founder Sam Bankman-Fried is facing charges of fraud and money laundering in the U.S.


4. QuadrigaCX Scandal (2019)

Summary of the Incident:

QuadrigaCX, a Canada-based cryptocurrency exchange, was solely controlled by its founder Gerald Cotten.

In 2018, Cotten’s sudden death rendered access to the platform’s wallets impossible, resulting in the loss of approximately $190 million worth of user assets.

Breach of Responsibility:

Poor Management: Sole control of private keys by one individual was a critical error.

Inadequate Security Protocols: The company failed to protect customer funds properly.

Outcome:

QuadrigaCX users initiated legal proceedings but suffered significant losses.

The platform’s mismanagement served as a major lesson for the industry.


5. Robinhood Crypto Breach (2020)

Summary of the Incident:

The crypto division of U.S.-based financial services company Robinhood was investigated by the SEC for improper management of user funds and lack of necessary security measures.

Breach of Responsibility:

Regulatory Non-Compliance: Robinhood underreported a portion of user funds and misrepresented its financial position.

Lack of Transparency: Users were not provided with sufficient information.

Outcome:

Robinhood paid a $65 million fine.

The company took significant steps to improve regulatory compliance.


Conclusion and Lessons

1. Security Measures:
Platforms should implement cold wallets, insurance funds, and advanced security protocols to protect user funds.

2. Transparency:
Platforms must provide clear information about transaction fees, risks, and financial conditions to gain user trust.

3. Legal Compliance:
Operating in compliance with regulatory standards prevents legal issues and user losses.

4. User Awareness:
Users should prioritize licensed and transparent companies when choosing platforms.

These cases emphasize the severe losses caused by neglecting responsibilities and highlight the importance of proper management by cryptocurrency platforms.
© All rights reserved.
Crypto Law Istanbul - 2025
Made on
Tilda